نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Based on common definitions, jurisprudence has been designed to explain and elaborate the rules and their evidences. By evidences we mean the documents that prove that a certain rule is God’s command and according to expression of the jurists the reason for issuing a rule is not related to the mysteries of rules and the philosophy which is concealed in its issuance. The jurist is not obliged to unveil these secrets, however the increasing expansion of communities, versatility, and plurality of the necessary issues in the society have proven that reliance on the evidences doesn’t fulfill the needs of the society and one cannot expect that there should be a reason from among the legal evidences for every social necessary issue. Therefore, it will be inevitable to seek help of the reasons of legal evidences to determine the religious task at the time of silence or ambiguity or religious rules and to generalize the existing rules to other cases by means of reason or in the cases when the reason is resolved the rules also have to be resolved and to expand or spoil religious rules. This important issue necessitates that the jurists do not suffice to express the evidences and to take a step toward etiology. The present study aims at explaining the accurate meaning of the reason and the necessity to explore and explain the reasons of rules and consequences of incorrect etiology to prepare the ground for the movement of jurisprudence from explaining the evidences to explaining the reasons and to provide the fundamentals of establishing the evidential jurisprudence through identifying the correct methods of reason exploration. By doing this, it can help and improve the evidential jurisprudence and can prevent from undesirable effects of unprofessional reasoning for rules.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
ـ قرآن کریم.
10. حلی، حسین‌بن یوسف‌بن مطهر حلی (1407 ق). کشف المراد فی شرح تجرید الاعتقاد، متن از نصیرالدین طوسی، مترجم ابوالحسن الشعرانی: نشر مؤسسه النشر الاسلامی.
21. سبزواری، علی (1396). بررسی تطبیقی الغای خصوصیت نزد امامیه با قیاس معتبر نزد عامه، مطالعات اصول فقه امامیه، دروۀ 10، شمارۀ 8: 7 – 32.
