نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آیتاللهالعظمی بروجردی (ره)، بروجرد، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آیتاللهالعظمی بروجردی (ره)، بروجرد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Based on some reasons in Islamic law, the confession is one of the evidences for proving litigation. There are different views, however, on the number of positive confession needed for proving offenses. Some argue that except exceptional cases, a single confession is generally sufficient for proving offenses, but, others believe that proving offenses generally necessitates multiple confessions. Meanwhile, some jurists and authors distinguishing the crimes related to the divine rights (haqqollah) from the ones related to the man’s rights (haqqonnas), asserted another theory in this respect. The present article, using a descriptive-analytical method, has criticized this viewpoint and concluded that it has many ambiguities and challenges in the fields of concepts and reasons and if it enforced, the judicial proceedings will face some problems.
کلیدواژهها [English]