نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قم، قم، ایران
2 دانشیار دانشکدۀ حقوق دانشگاه تهران، پردیس فارابی، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
According to the theory of determinative right of retaliation, the avenger of blood in the case of murder has only the right of retaliation and demanding the blood money depends on the murderer’s satisfaction. But, according to the alternative theory of the right of retaliation, the avenger of blood is free to choose between retaliation and blood money and the murderer is obliged to do whatever the avenger chooses. Although, the theory of determinative right of retaliation is well-known in Imamiyya jurisprudence, its reasons and arguments lack sufficient integrity and sometimes it faces practical challenges like wasting the blood of victim and not respecting the interests of the avengers of blood. Although the legislator has deviated from the Islamic Penal Code 2013 and has complied with the dual criteria in order to solve a number of problems, it has not been able to solve all the problems and the negative consequences of this theory; while it could act harmoniously and systematically through complying completely with the alternative theory.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
ـ قرآن کریم.
10. حلی (ابن‌علامه)، محمدبن الحسن (1387ق). ایضاح الفوائد، جلد 4، قم: المطبعة العلمیة.
21. ـــــــــــــــــ (1387ق). المبسوط، جلد 7، تهران: المکتبة المرتضویة لااحیاء الآثار الجعفریة.
29. کاسانی، ابوبکربن مسعودبن احمد (1406ق). بدائع الصنائع فی ترتیب الشرائع، بی‌جا: دارالکتب العلمیة.
