نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Article 1069 of the Iranian civil code has voided stipulation of the right ofrecessionin marriage contract but it is silent about the effect of void of stipulation on contract, while in the Imamiyyah jurisprudence in addition to the void of stipulation of the right ofrecession in marriage contract, the famous maintain such stipulation as void. However the question is whether the void of stipulation is based on the strong reasons and whether the aforementioned stipulation must be considered merely as a void stipulation or the void of marriage contract is necessary too? Moreover, is the void of stipulation appertained to perpetual marriage or is it also true in temporary marriage? The present study, taking a descriptive-analytical method of research, has reinvestigated the subject from juridical and legal viewpoint. Analyzing the different reasons, it concludes that from jurisprudential view as a whole, the stronger opinion is void of perpetual marriage contract (not temporary marriage). Principally, this stipulation does not render marriage contract void. The silence of the legislator on the void of marriage contract also depends on the acceptance of validity of marriage contract. Of course not distinguishing between the perpetual and temporary contract as to the void of stipulation of the right ofrecession deserves criticism and amendment.
کلیدواژهها [English]
11. امامی، سید حسن (1374). حقوق مدنی، جلد 4، تهران: کتابفروشی اسلامیه.