نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
عضو هیات علمی پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Regarding the effect of denial after confessing in self-retribution, it can be discussed in two ways. The first one: confessing to intentional murder and then another person's confession to the same murder, and the first confessor's reference to the confession; The second sub-section: the effect of denial after confessing to intentional murder without the presence of another person's confession to the same murder; In the first chapter, it means confessing to intentional murder and then another person confessing to the same murder and the confession of the first confessor, according to famous jurists, retribution is paid from the treasury and in the second chapter, there is no extensive discussion in jurisprudence texts. The question is whether, from all the evidence, the denial after confessing to the intentional murder of Muscat is retribution? It seems that according to the narration of Jameel bin Darraj and other evidences, denial after confession causes qisas to fall, but the dowry is not canceled, and the doer has the right to refer to the confessor, and in addition to the dowry, the ruler can determine the appropriate punishment.
کلیدواژهها [English]
