عنوان مقاله [English]
The main pathology in the field of jurisprudential and legal ijtihad methodology is that the keywords of methodology, group ijtihad, religious sociability, legal requirements, and the form of social thinking that are or are suspected in this writing, or do not cover all aspects, Either their semantic relations are not systematic or they are lacking in the keywords in explaining the rule of object-binding. This essay emphasizes the division of methodology into fundamental methodology and applied methodology, with a new approach to religious socialization and a new explanation of the anthropological and sociological foundations of ijtihad and legitimacy, social thought, and material exclusion and detailed results. One of the fruits of social thinking is that the legitimacy of the needs of the adorned new needs and the group's ijtihad reaches new dynamics and richness with actual action. It is with this systematic revival that the process of legitimation becomes a process of conformity to the requirements, and the resulting law becomes free from structural and content disagreements. Maintaining and strengthening the position of the legislature and the Guardian Council as part of the legislative body is in line with the above approach to ijtihad.