عنوان مقاله [English]
Jurisprudence and ethics have responsibilities in relation to perfection. These two areas of science have similarities and differences. As yet, although many decision have been made about the relationship of “jurisprudence”, “ethics” and “mysticism”, it is hard to achieve the common conclusion through all these decisions, while the judgment of any of the researcher is based on their perception of the meaning of “Jurisprudence”, “ethics”. Therefore, understanding relationship, homogeneity and heterogeneity of jurisprudence and ethics, requires determining different aspects of these two areas. This study aims to explain the necessity to separate different meaning of “jurisprudence” term meanwhile, reveals the homonym of different application of “jurisprudence” term and eventually discuss the relationship among different meanings and the relation of “jurisprudence” and “ethics” and compare their role in human.