نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Proving “the validity of lexicologist’s statement” is an important matter in the Principles of Jurisprudence which has not been considered yet in the perspective of the realities of the lexical history. The word “lexicologist” also has not been defined yet. Both of them will be defined in detail in the present text. The history of lexicography indicates that the Arabic words have been communicated to us properly and completely. The history is significantly confidence-building and although in some cases a number of the scholars of the Principles of Jurisprudence have been working efficiently to prove “lexicologist’s statement” in different ways like lexicologist’s proficiency, Insidād e-Ṣaghīr, the practice of the wise people, and Ijmā٫(unanimous consensus of Mujtaḥidīn), it is not sufficient. Field studies and historical investigations of the Arab lexicography make it clear that “the clear history of Arab lexicography, the proper communication of the words, the Arab’s original explanations” and “lexicologist’s proficiency”- of course in a new explanation- are two major evidences to prove the validity of the lexicologist’s statement.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
11. ابن‌فارس، احمد (۱۳۸۲ هـ.ق). الصاحبی فی فقه اللغه و مسائلها و سنن العرب فی کلامها، تصحیح مصطفی شویهی، بیروت، بدران.
50. سیوطی، جلال‌الدین (بی‌تا). تدریب الراوی فی شرح تقریب النواوی، تحقیق عبدالوهاب عبدالطیف، القاهره، مکتبه دارالتراث.
66. قیسی، ابومحمد مکی‌بن ابی‌طالب (1404 هـ.ق). العمده فی غریب القرآن، تحقیق یوسف عبد الحمن المرعشی، مؤسسة الرساله.
