عنوان مقاله [English]
One of the conditions for the correctness of endowment is to have a legitimate ownership, objectiveness, ability to possess and eternality of the object of endowment. On this basis, the correctness, the opponents of the correctness of moral rights endowment have cast doubts over the possibility of endowment of moral rights – which according to its functions is one of the important issues in the area of social and economic issues.
Of course there are also advocates for the endowment of moral rights whose reasons are mainly general, pervasive and beyond endowment and have judged the conditions under dispute as unacceptable fully based on rules and principles which are not aimed at endowment. These evidences basically cast doubt over the obligations of conditions under dispute.
In this analytical-descriptive research, through criticism and review of the evidences of both pros and cons, this result has been obtained that the general evidences of the pros are unable to neutral the conditions under dispute and in other words, through this way, it is not possible to prove the legitimacy of the endowment of moral rights, but due to the fact that faults made by opponents are not acceptable considering A)the philosophy of forging the disputable conditions in endowment and B) revision in their concepts, so the correctness and legitimacy of the endowment of moral rights are proved.