عنوان مقاله [English]
According to the Imamate jurisprudence, the precepts are based on the individuals` interest in order to prevent the occurrence of corruption, especially the disable persons such as the innocent children. In this research, by descriptive-analytical method, by reviewing the author's evidence cited to the Imamie jurisprudence, the results are as follows: firstly, according to his own methodology, he has considered some jurisprudents` viewpoint as the famous jurisprudents` comment, or in the question of disagreement, he has preferred the opinion of some of them. Secondly, the viewpoint of the contemporary jurisprudents is more in direction with equality of the walid zina`s rights , but the author regards the ancient scholars` theory as the standard of Imami jurisprudence; thirdly, according to the famous jurisprudents` belief, in the stage of proof, just as the probability of being the walid zina is not present, his inherent cleanness will be established and with such ease, he will be entitled to the right to evidence, inherit, judge and so on. Finally, due to his different methodology, his legal conclusions are also in conflict with the jurisprudents .