نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
عضو هیئت علمی/ پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Abstract
One of the duties of the Prophet (S) and the Shia Imams (AS) is to express the Sharia rulings. However, there are different views between Shia and Sunni jurists regarding whether the Prophet (S) and the Imams (AS) have used the method of ijtihad and deriving rulings from religious texts in understanding and expressing Sharia rulings. Some Sunni jurists believe that ijtihad was permissible for the Prophet (S) and that he did ijtihad in many cases to express the Sharia rulings. On the other hand, some Sunni jurists and most of the Imami jurists have not allowed ijtihad for the Prophet (S) and the Imams (AS) and have denied doing this act on their part. Another point of view confirmed in this research is that ijtihad can be divided into two types of special ijtihad and general ijtihad. Special ijtihad is not permissible for the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) and they did not do it, but general ijtihad is permissible for them and this act was done in many cases with specific goals. In this research, while expressing the mentioned views and criticizing some of them, the latter view was proposed and proven with many proofs.
کلیدواژهها [English]
