نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق دانشگاه قم
2 دانشیار، دانشکده الهیات ، دانشگاه قم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the significant issues in Islamic jurisprudence is the discussion of "Irshad al-Jāhil" . Despite the well-known fatwa on the obligation of guiding the ignorant in matters of religious rulings, only a few jurists have issued fatwas on its obligation in matters of subject-matter. The majority of jurists, relying on certain narrations , hold that guiding the ignorant is not obligatory, except in critical cases such as preserving life. This research, employing a descriptive-analytical method, examines the validity of the arguments from both perspectives. Ultimately, by presenting a challenge to the prevailing fatwa, it concludes that this fatwa is inconsistent with another principle known as the "rule of the obligation to inform the ignorant regarding what is given" . Although a preliminary solution to resolve this contradiction involves interpreting the latter rule as applying to cases of causation , this interpretation faces difficulties, such as its inconsistency with the principle of the dependence of rulings on interests and harms , the obligation of benevolence towards believers , and opposition to certain narrations. This paper, by proposing an alternative solution, concludes that either the scope of critical cases in the prevailing view should be expanded, or, fundamentally, guiding the ignorant...
کلیدواژهها [English]
