نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 .استادیار، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی ،دانشگاه خوارزمی ،تهران ، ایران
2 .دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی (Ph.D)، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی ، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In the quality of retribution for a group that participates in the murder of one person, there are two bases among the Imami jurists.Most jurists believe that the guardian of the tail can retaliate against all partners in murder, provided that he pays the diyat in excess of each person's crime. Some other jurists believe that the guardian of the tail can retaliate against one of the killers, and the other partners must pay the ransom in excess of their crime to the retaliated person.The present study seeks to answer the question of whether it is possible to retaliate against a group that has been involved in the murder of a person. We come to this conclusion by examining the authentic and valid narrations which are the main and most important reason of each of the parties.The emergence of narrations indicating the permission of retaliation for one of the partners in premeditated murder, with the text of the narrations indicating retaliation of all the partners in premeditated murder, is bound and carried with hatred, and as a result, all partners in crime can be retaliated against.
کلیدواژهها [English]
